Inhalt

in Literatur blättern

  • Detailansicht

Bibliographische Angaben zur Publikation

Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: A systematic review of the literature


Autor/in:

Mudgeemail, Suzie; Stott, N. Susan


Herausgeber/in:

Chartered Society of Physiotherapy


Quelle:

Physiotherapy, 2007, Volume 93 (Issue 3), Seite 189-200, London: Elsevier, ISSN: 0031-9406 (Print); 1873-1465 (Online)


Jahr:

2007



Abstract:


Objectives:

The recovery of independent walking is an important goal in stroke rehabilitation. The objective of this systematic review was to identify all outcome measures used in the stroke research literature that included an evaluation of walking ability and evaluate the concepts contained in these measures with reference to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.

Data sources:

Searches were conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for the time period January 1990-December 2005 using appropriate keywords.

Review methods:
Studies were selected for further analysis if they used one or more standardized outcome measure incorporating an aspect of walking defined by the ICF. The outcome measure had to have published psychometric properties and specifically measure walking rather than mobility. The content of each outcome measure was classified with reference to the ICF subcategories for walking. The number of times each outcome measure was used was calculated.

Results:

Three hundred and fifty-seven studies met the selection criteria. Sixty-one different outcome measures were used a total of 848 times to measure walking ability. Six of the outcome measures reflected impairment and 52 reflected limitations of activity and participation. The other three outcome measures showed overlap between domains, reflecting aspects of both impairment and limitations in activity and participation. The three most frequently used measures (self-paced gait speed measured over a short distance, spatiotemporal parameters and fast gait speed) were used 350 times but only assessed one ICF subcategory. The Rivermead Mobility Index and the Adapted Patient Evaluation Conference System assessed the greatest number of ICF subcategories but were used only 19 times and once respectively.

Conclusions:

The most frequently used outcome measures reflect only one aspect of walking ability: walking short distances. Mobility tasks related to function in the community, like walking long distances, around obstacles and over uneven ground, and moving around outside or in buildings other then the home are not well represented by outcome measures used in most studies.


Weitere Informationen:


Schlagworte:
Informationen in der ICF:


Dokumentart:


Zeitschriftenbeitrag / Forschungsergebnis




Bezugsmöglichkeit:


Physiotherapy
Homepage: https://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/current

Um Literatur zu beziehen, wenden Sie sich bitte an Bibliotheken, die Herausgeber, den Verlag oder an den Buch- und Zeitschriftenhandel.



Referenznummer:

R/ZA3199


Informationsstand: 22.07.2011

in Literatur blättern